Engage
Send a brief. We will tell you if there is a fit.
Confidential intake for election campaign consulting and constituency platform consultation. Candidates, sitting MPs and MLAs, party caucuses, constituency offices. Treat the form as the first memo — not a brochure request.
Who this is for
Serious principals with a defined mandate.
- Candidates entering active campaign windows
- Sitting MPs and MLAs
- Party units and caucuses
- Constituency offices
- Principals with a named political mandate
What to include
Treat the form as the first memo.
- Geography and jurisdiction
- Campaign or officeholder context
- Timeline and clock
- The current operational challenge
- Who is in the room
- Whether the need is advisory, mandata.ai, or both
What happens next
Speak with Barnstorm Co-operations
- 1. Confidential review. A director at Barnstorm Co-operations reads the brief.
- 2. Fit or no-fit is stated. We do not take every race.
- 3. If aligned: a principals-only discussion, then a one-page proposal.
- 4. Where appropriate, a strategic intake call — not a pitch deck.
Confidentiality
Named staff. No public intake email.
Barnstorm Co-operations treats the brief as a live file. We will not sit both sides of a race. Platform licenses in a contested constituency are disclosed before contract.
Confidential intake
Submit a confidential intake. A director at Barnstorm Co-operations reads it. If there is no fit, we say so.
WhatsApp a directorLive Intelligence & Ground Zero Feed
Barnstorm Co-operations Intelligence
@barncops
Just processed the turnout data for the third phase. The 5K margin swing is real. Read our latest memo.
2h
Barnstorm Co-operations Intelligence
@barncops
Night-round booth sheets are in. The swing sits in three polling parts, not across the whole assembly.
5h
Barnstorm Co-operations Intelligence
@barncops
Jan-Sunwai queue cleared before dusk. A grievance that is not on the desk by evening did not happen.
1d
Questions principals actually ask
Confidential intake
Candidates entering campaign windows, sitting MPs and MLAs, party units and caucuses, constituency offices, and serious principals with a defined mandate.
Geography, campaign or officeholder context, timeline, the current operational challenge, who is in the room, and whether the need is advisory, mandata.ai, or both.
Confidential review by a director. Fit or no-fit is stated. If aligned: a principals-only discussion, then a one-page proposal — race command, governing retainer, or platform license.
Named staff only. We do not list a public intake email. We will not sit both sides of a race. Platform licenses in a contested constituency are disclosed before contract.
Yes. Mark the need as mandata.ai. Parties and large offices with a bench often start with a platform walkthrough rather than an advisory seat.
No. Qualification is the point of the form. If there is no fit, Barnstorm Co-operations says so — that is the product, not a courtesy.